- If you know the suffix proto-, what features of Theodore Roosevelt's Progressives were the most proto-fascist?
- the most proto-communist?
- What progress of the last 100 years would you see rolled back?
- You, and those who work for you and Fox News have done a fair job linking Progressives to both Nazis and Soviets through the use of the catch phrase "Social Justice." Are you aware of any professional or academic research that attempts to links the Progressives to the fascists? Please do not include any research you, or Fox News, has helped fund or has instigated.
2010-03-03
Questions for Glenn Beck
2010-02-27
Trent Franks Compares Slavery Favorably to Abortion
And Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona said today that the abortion rate among black women means that “Far more of the African-American community is being devastated by the policies of today than were being devastated by policies of slavery."
From WIIIAI
2010-02-25
Sen Coburn on fraud
It isn't clear if Senator Coburn's statements on preventative care were actually linked to any proposals, and therefore represent a sincere contribution, but his discussion of fixing "fraud" in government indicates, to me, insincerity. He talks about doing it "tomorrow." Tomorrow this little confab will be over.
2010-02-14
The Crazy Nitze, NSC-68 continued
The assault on free institutions is world-wide now, and in the context of the present polarization of power a defeat of free institutions anywhere is a defeat everywhere.
Really, Paul? Really? Our loss in Viet Nam meant freedom was defeated everywhere? When the Soviets ended the Hungarian 1956 revolution freedom was defeated everywhere? Where do they get these people?
NSC 68 by Paul Nitze, an important Cold War Document
Somewhere into it I found this quote and instantly Glenn Beck jumped to mind, principally because he is amazingly irresponsible (as are many of his fans) but also because I wondered what he'd think of it, especially if you got someone to say it was from a bad source before he heard it:
Also, I find it odd that this paragraph, which I like, is in a national security document. Nitze could have just said we are free and they are a tyranny, but he goes on here to define free. I certainly wasn't expecting to find anything I'd like here, and I am finding quite a few sentences which are unbalanced (grave threats are mentioned, but so far none of our abilities to counter them are addressed, entirely one sided).
The free society values the individual as an end in himself, requiring of him only that measure of self-discipline and self-restraint which make the rights of each individual compatible with the rights of every other individual. The freedom of the individual has as its counterpart, therefore, the negative responsibility of the individual not to exercise his freedom in ways inconsistent with the freedom of other individuals and the positive responsibility to make constructive use of his freedom in the building of a just society.
Also, I find it odd that this paragraph, which I like, is in a national security document. Nitze could have just said we are free and they are a tyranny, but he goes on here to define free. I certainly wasn't expecting to find anything I'd like here, and I am finding quite a few sentences which are unbalanced (grave threats are mentioned, but so far none of our abilities to counter them are addressed, entirely one sided).
2010-02-13
Is It Possible To Be Happy?
Is It Possible To Be Happy?
The meaning of the above is found in Google and based on the idea that $cientologists $uck.
The meaning of the above is found in Google and based on the idea that $cientologists $uck.
2010-01-30
Blair Spinning, Or Being Cagily Truthful?
Headline from the Times UK reads "Iraq inquiry: Tony Blair slated for Iran threat claim" followed by
Maybe Blair's just saying Iran poses no threat at all?
Tony Blair’s claims that Iran now poses as serious a threat as Saddam Hussein's Iraq have been dismissed as a "piece of spin" by the British ambassador to Tehran.
Maybe Blair's just saying Iran poses no threat at all?
2010-01-28
Simplifying the "shortest unique" string of DNA
Find the shortest length of the beginning of the gene in question (AUG,...,...,...) which identifies that gene uniquely and only operate from there, hunting the shortest unique sequence that the cancer has.
2010-01-22
More Specifically
Referring to the last post
- Sequence the person's (healthy) genome
- Do a biopsy and sequence the cancerous mutation
- Find the {edit:] shortest sequence in the cancer that isn't in the genome
- Develop a broken, homing mega-endonuclease to locate it
2010-01-17
Broken Homing Endonuclease Cancer Cures
Homing Endonuclease seeks out certain sequences in DNA and cleaves it at that point. Normally a ligase would simply find the two cleaved ends and fuse them together with some small ATP cost. However, if the enzymatic functioning was broken, leaving one cleaved end difficult or impossible to rejoin to the other, the endonuclease could impair or kill the host cell. While typically only short sequences of base pairs are recognized (as few as 6 base pairs in restriction modification systems in bacteria), mega-endonucleases which recognized far larger sequences might be developed to operate only sequences of base pairs associated with the patient's cancer.
If perfect, only recognizing the cancerous cells, inundation of the patient with the broken homing endonuclease could be sufficient, but delivery via virus is certainly also a possibility.
If perfect, only recognizing the cancerous cells, inundation of the patient with the broken homing endonuclease could be sufficient, but delivery via virus is certainly also a possibility.
2010-01-10
Thank you President Bush
During Bush's 8 years in office direct aid to Israel dropped from 4.1 to 2.4 billion dollars.
2010-01-03
Why don't they just ask Cheney this?
While you were in office, Vice President Cheney, you and the Bush administration set up the Transportation Safety Administration and had some role in setting its policies. What rules or regulations that you and the Bush administration set up did President Obama change to make the Christmas bombing more likely?
The way I hear it, there was so little explosive that the guy who put the fire out got some burns on his hands, and the attempted "bomber" got some 3rd degree burns. Does anyone really think you can take down a plane with so little explosives that it doesn't even kill the guy who has the bomb in his underpants?
The way I hear it, there was so little explosive that the guy who put the fire out got some burns on his hands, and the attempted "bomber" got some 3rd degree burns. Does anyone really think you can take down a plane with so little explosives that it doesn't even kill the guy who has the bomb in his underpants?
Ireland Now Has Blasphemy Laws
Blashempy.ie has taken a nice step. I was thinking of one, not listed, hopefully I'll remember. I think my favorite listed one is:
Ah, now I remember:
Religion easily has the greatest bullshit story ever told. Think about it. Religion has actually convinced people that there’s an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever ’til the end of time! But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He’s all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can’t handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes, and they always need a little more. Now, talk about a good bullshit story. Holy Shit!-- George Carlin, 1999
Ah, now I remember:
2010-01-01
What's the worst story from Thursday, December 31st, 2009?
Savvy people know that the government cynically releases the worst news on Friday evenings, knowing that less people pay attention. The worst news of the year, however, is saved for the week when almost no one is paying attention, Christmas - New Year's. So, what was the worst story? What story should we hammer and hammer and hammer and hammer? My guess is lots of murdering Blackwater employees get off Scot-Free!
2009-12-27
Unexpected Thing I Read Today about post-war Iraq versus post-WWII Germany and Japan
The gist was that the Allies were planning for the worst, and their original occupation orders and rules of engagement included some pretty harsh counter-measures. Public execuations, for example, not only were in the playbook, but actually happened, including of a 16 and 17 year old pair accused of recording and transmitting U.S. troop movements (to whom?!).
Very quickly, within months, in both Germany and Japan, it turned out that such orders were not required to keep the peace, and a process of scaling back the authority of individual unit commanders to dispense justice was curtailed.
In passing, the author contrasts this with what happened in Iraq, where our side was convinced we'd be treated as liberators, and, just perhaps, [ed: I'm mentioning this crime, not mention in the article] crimes like looting were virtually ignored, rather than some sort of deadly penalty enforced.
The article doesn't mention that the Bush administration put incompetent lackeys in charge of Iraq, while the same can't be said for Truman, Eisenhower and MacArthur's actions in WWII. That never helped, and it would be nice to see Bush spend some years in jail just for that.
Still, it seems like a good basis for arguing the Bush administration was too nice after the invasion, principally, of course, because they thought they were the best things ever, and figured everyone else shared the same view.
Melissa Willard-Foster, "Planning the Peace and Ending the Surrender: Deterrence in the Allied Occuptions of Germany and Japan" Journal of Interdisciplinary History XI.1 (2009) 33-56
Very quickly, within months, in both Germany and Japan, it turned out that such orders were not required to keep the peace, and a process of scaling back the authority of individual unit commanders to dispense justice was curtailed.
In passing, the author contrasts this with what happened in Iraq, where our side was convinced we'd be treated as liberators, and, just perhaps, [ed: I'm mentioning this crime, not mention in the article] crimes like looting were virtually ignored, rather than some sort of deadly penalty enforced.
The article doesn't mention that the Bush administration put incompetent lackeys in charge of Iraq, while the same can't be said for Truman, Eisenhower and MacArthur's actions in WWII. That never helped, and it would be nice to see Bush spend some years in jail just for that.
Still, it seems like a good basis for arguing the Bush administration was too nice after the invasion, principally, of course, because they thought they were the best things ever, and figured everyone else shared the same view.
Melissa Willard-Foster, "Planning the Peace and Ending the Surrender: Deterrence in the Allied Occuptions of Germany and Japan" Journal of Interdisciplinary History XI.1 (2009) 33-56
2009-12-25
A more plausible, I think, version of the story of Jesus
Well, I wrote it, so of course I think it is more plausible. Jesus the Galilean.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
